Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are being debated today on their entitlement to security, with arguments suggesting that as they have transitioned to being seen as “mere celebrities,” they should not receive state-funded protection. Despite recent encounters with a stalker during Harry’s visit to the UK, where the individual came within close proximity to him, it is contended that they no longer qualify for security covered by British taxpayers.
Even though Harry has faced security breaches, including incidents where his private security had to intervene, it is emphasized that the decision on state-backed protection is determined by an executive committee. Jane Moore, a well-known columnist, highlighted in The Sun that Harry and Meghan’s shift to pursuing commercial ventures has redefined their status to that of celebrities rather than working royals. This change in classification raises questions about their eligibility for continued security support.
Jane further argued that other celebrities facing similar stalking threats do not receive state-provided security, questioning why Harry and Meghan should be an exception. The debate also referenced instances involving high-profile figures like Shirley Ballas and Myleene Klass, underscoring the challenges faced by individuals in the public eye regarding personal security.
As the couple navigates their post-royal life and engages in commercial activities, the discussion surrounding their security coverage continues to spark conversations about the boundaries between royal privilege and celebrity status.